Legal AI / participatory designlegal AI / e-discoveryParticipation documented

Legal Track of TREC Participatory Design

Ithaca, United States

"The evaluation goals and design methods of Legal Track were in large part driven by domain practitioners rather than computer scientists, despite it being a computational research venue. Further, we find that by structuring design and evaluation activities through the format of an extended role-play simulation, Legal

participatory designhuman-centered AIproblem formulationdesignevaluation
Overview
Region
North America
Lead organization
Cornell University
Organization type
nonprofit + university collaboration
Technology group
information retrieval and legal document review
Activity status
completed
Start year
Not documented
Last updated
Mar 25, 2026
Details
Participation mode
co-design with affected users and domain experts
Participation group
Co Design
Technology description
information retrieval and legal document review
Funding
Not documented
Region of activity
national

Community input

Corrections, annotations, and private disclosure requests.

Legal Track of TREC Participatory Design has 0 published community items.

Published corrections

Loading moderation history...

Published annotations

Loading annotations...

Submit a correction

Flag a metadata problem or submit a dispute for Legal Track of TREC Participatory Design.

Submit an annotation

Add context without editing the record itself.

Request restricted disclosure

These requests are private and reviewed for later releases.

Related records

Legal AI / participatory designNorth America
Legal Track of TREC

Gaithersburg, United States

Open record
Online governance / community experimentsNorth America
CivilServant

Cambridge, United States

Open record
Public dialogue / AI governanceNorth America
U.S. Public Assembly on High Risk AI

United States (online), United States

Open record